What is unaliagted? let discuss in detail.

0
255
dan clear maLPlF58XnE unsplash
dan clear maLPlF58XnE unsplash

Unaffiliated is a term used to describe someone who is not part of any political party. 

It can also refer to people who are unaffiliated with any religious group.

 An unaligned person may fully agree with the principles but take no active part in the electoral system, 

or may compose their own beliefs that don’t fit into an established framework.

 Unaffiliated people often lean towards liberalism, unclear on why they disagree with what other groups stand for. 

Often times there are more than one reasons an individual might be unaffiliated,

such as lack of time or lack of interest in joining a certain group;

 this also makes it difficult to generalize the motivations behind an individual’s choice to be unaligned.

An unchurched individual is a person who does not affiliate themselves with a religious group. 

The terms chrurch and churchgoers are used interchangeably,

 but the former is exclusive to religious groups while the latter is more neutral in describing 

someone who attends a non-religious institution that strives towards community, charity, or education. 

Unaffiliated people often lean towards liberalism, unclear on why they disagree with what other groups stand for

.

 this also makes it difficult to generalize the motivations behind an individual’s choice to be unaligned.

An unaffiliated voter is a person who is not part of any political party. The terms democrat, democrat, and dem are used interchangeably,

 but the first two refer to people who are Democrats or Democrat-identifying

while the latter is more neutral in describing someone who votes for a non-political party. 

Unaffiliated voters often lean towards liberalism, unclear on why they disagree with what other groups stand for.

 this also makes it difficult to generalize the motivations behind an individual’s choice to be unaligned.

Unaligned individuals are people who don’t identity with a political party. 

The terms libertarian, republican, and republicanist are used interchangeably,

 but the first two refer to people who are Republicans or 

Republican-identifying while the latter is more neutral in describing someone who does not identify with any political party. 

Unaligned individuals often lean towards liberalism, unclear on why they disagree with what other groups stand for. 

this also makes it difficult to generalize the motivations behind an individual’s choice to be unaligned.

Unbeliever is a term used to describe someone who does not believe in any kind of higher power, deity, or supreme being. 

The terms atheist and agnostic are used interchangeably, 

but the former is exclusive to those who don’t believe in an active deity 

while the latter is more neutral in describing someone who doesn’t believe a deity has a direct role in the universe’s creation or operation. 

Unbelievers often lean towards liberal views, unclear on why they disagree with what other groups stand for. 

There are several terms used to qualify the types of people who don’t qualify as belonging to a political party or religious group

, but share many other characteristics in common with these entities.

 Claiming someone is “unaffiliated” is usually synonymous with saying they don’t belong to either political groups or religions, possibly because the term is easier.

What is Unaliagted?

Unaliagted is a political party in India.

 It was founded in 2005 by Mohan Bhagwat, the current RSS sarsanghchalak. 

The party contested the 2009 general elections and won 1 seat in parliament and 2 seats in the states assemblies of Goa and Maharashtra. 

According to its manifesto, the main objective of the Unaliagted Party is to defend and protect Hinduism and work towards a Hindu Rashtra.

 Incidentally, this reminds me about an Indian show called “Malgudi days”

 where there was a character called Swami who claimed he will make India hindu rastra which means hindu nation(in sanskrit) .

Like it or not, now India has become a country where every now and then we see stories regarding people’s right to criticize our religion. 

For example, recently in Maharashtra news broke out of an effort by some people

 to have the word “Hinduism” declared as an official religion of the state. 

The idea that it is legal for anyone to declare that they are the head of Hinduism is quite worrying 

since this is an organization where so many people belong to so many different religions of which there are very different interpretations.

This move also implies that non-Hindus will be treated differently in public spaces, for example in temples or at road side shrines. 

They will have the status of being a second class citizen.

There are so many things to say about these people, ranging from how they misinterpret their own holy scriptures to how they don’t even represent a majority. 

But what you should know is that I’m not going to waste my time trying to debate this issue with them because I’m not going to change their minds. 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here